Lifestyle or Legacy – Part 3

Let’s turn to the Legacy Builders.They are the business owners who have achieved Lifestyle status (as defined in the last posting) but continue to work hard to build their businesses. Their objective is a company that does far more than merely provide a comfortable lifestyle and assure retirement.

A little bit of elimination to start, as we did with the Lifestyle owners. Just as we said a Lifestyle Business was neither a pumped-up hobby nor merely an adjunct to an alternative lifestyle, the Legacy owner isn’t a couple of things that people might normally assume.

Let’s set a baseline. The typical Legacy Builder runs a business that is very capable of continuing its day to day activities independently and indefinitely. Operations, management and sales are handled by competent employees. In fact, each is probably better than the owner at what he or she does. They are in the top 1% of American incomes. It varies widely, but we’ll call it a minimum of $500,000 a year. The Legacy Builder nonetheless chooses to work a full (45-50 hour) week to continue developing and improving the business, and not incidentally adding to its profit.

The Legacy builder is clearly not obsessive-compulsive, a workaholic, or in any other way driven unwillingly to work beyond common sense. It’s easy for observers (and sometimes family) to accuse the Legacy Builder of being enslaved to the job, unable to tear away for a personal life. That isn’t true at all. The Legacy Builders I am describing spend time with family and other pursuits. They coach Little League, attend recitals, and are active in the community. They take nice vacations (usually with family), and live in nice homes (often several of them), but are seldom ostentatious.

It is true that they are frequently missing in the devotion of time to community activities, preferring to fund the work of others. In fairness, I’ve spent a lot of time working in community organizations. There is a lot of wasted time. If I had the money to pay for someone else to do it, I probably would. Legacy Builders don’t like to have their time wasted.

They are also not greedy. Their continued push for improvement is not for the personal gain. They seek greater success for other reasons. As Bill Gates once said, “Money is just a way to keep score.”

I call them the Legacy Builders because they have an eye for a target that is beyond merely running a successful business. They have a bigger picture; a larger objective in mind. Developing an organization that lives beyond their own careers is at the core of their strategy, but it isn’t just monument-building that drives them. It is what that organization can accomplish.

Some are motivated by the benefit to the community that their talent can deliver. More jobs, more people who can provide security for their families. For others it is even a greater community responsibility, the money to form a foundation, or to fund worthwhile causes. For others their family is the motivation. They seek to change the lifestyle of their children, and their children’s children, permanently (or at least for the next few generations).

Many of the Legacy Builders are simply entrepreneurs without a limit on their creative drive. Most business owners have a difficult time looking backwards. Yesterday’s achievements are ancient history. They see no point to basking in past accomplishments when there is so much more that could be done.

Some Legacy Builders attempt things for the thrill of accomplishment. Once attained, the successes immediately become the basis for the next level, the next mountain to climb.

Admittedly, a substantial number of Legacy Builders have a head start when compared to bootstrap entrepreneurs. They achieved a substantial level of success in an existing organization, and used that as a spring board for their own purposes. They may come from a family where there was Legacy-type success in the past. They may have just been lucky. But none of those things explain their push for greater achievement in business when they are long past the point at which most owners would be satisfied; and there are plenty of bootstrap start-ups in the Legacy class to disabuse the notion that the game is fixed at the start.

Most Lifestyle owners say that they really want to reach Legacy levels, but few actually do. In my next post, the last in this series, we’ll look at what it takes to make the leap from Lifestyle to Legacy.

Posted in Exit Options, Exit Planning, Leadership, Life After | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Lifestyle or Legacy – Part 3

  1. Trina Hoefling says:

    Great series you're building here, John! Spot on. Thanks, Trina

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle vs. Legacy – Part 2

Let’s define a lifestyle business. For our purposes, I’ll start with what it isn’t.

It’s not the small retail store being run by someone who doesn’t need the money. A few years ago I was on a judging panel for a business award. One of the finalists told her story of how she struggled and labored to build her company. I was getting pretty impressed, until she mentioned that she hadn’t turned a profit until her 13th year in business. Fortunately, she said, her husband was a prominent surgeon and could afford to absorb her losses indefinitely.

That’s not a business, it’s a hobby. And it’s one that has an unfair advantage against the real businesses that have to compete against it.

I’m also not talking about the fantasy businesses that regularly grace the pages of Inc. Magazine and Entrepreneur. You know, those stories that read like a cross between People magazine and the Whole Earth Catalog. Where people live in a mountain top retreat, go kayaking with their employees on Tuesdays and Fridays, and sell imported herbal teas on the Internet. I envy them, but the number of such businesses are limited. Most of us are in far more plebeian environments, where the business requires hard work and constant attention.

My definition of a lifestyle business is one that allows you to live the life you want. The business isn’t integral to your lifestyle, as with the mountain-top tea seller’s. It is any business that generates the income you need to achieve your personal vision, and runs well enough to give you sufficient time to spend that income the way you choose. It can be any business, as long as it is one that can be separated from your personal life.

I’ve observed that most small business founders are seeking a lifestyle business. Their dreams include some base line achievements; financial security for their families, the ability to retire in comfort, and a few weeks of vacation without calling in to run the company by remote. I think those are the trip wires for defining the beginning of a lifestyle business.

Those basics are really just the criteria for a well run business. It has to go a bit further than that for a business to truly achieve “lifestyle” status. It mostly revolves around coming and going as you please. Depending on your interests, it may be working a four day week, or leaving at 3:00, or taking the children to school each day before coming in. Of course, in order to qualify, you can’t be slammed when you return as the price of your “free” time.

It also has to fund not only your immediate and future financial needs, but also generate sufficient excess to let you indulge in your chosen activities without sacrificing elsewhere. Private schools are a quality choice, not an economic decision. Recreation destinations are determined by the activity desired, without worrying about time, distance, equipment or cost. Physical fitness regimens are scheduled each day or week, and the business simply has to fit around them.

If you are not in the office, your phone doesn’t ring with problems; they are handled in the normal course of activity. If you say that you are going out, no one is worried about when you’ll be back. If the business has an off month it doesn’t affect your paycheck. When you want information of how the business is running, it is available instantly, preferably on your smart phone.

For the vast majority of small business owners, this is a description of perfection. I work with a number of business owners who have achieved this, or are close to it for extended periods of time. But I also work with many who are well past this point, yet continue pushing the envelope to make the business grow. These are the Legacy Builders, and we’ll discuss them next time.

Posted in Exit Options, Exit Planning, Leadership, Life After | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle vs. Legacy – Part 1

There are three types of business owners. The first, which encompasses the vast majority of small businesses, is the one who simply wants to make a living from running his or her business. They dream of the day that they can take vacations without worrying about the impact on their companies. Sometimes the biggest goal is to go home at five, or just to sleep through the night without worrying about the next day (thus the name of this blog).

But if you are tenacious, if you execute on your plans and are able to groom good employees, eventually you will join the owners who can take a good living for granted. Then you have to determine whether you want a lifestyle or a legacy.

I work with both lifestyle and legacy owners. Either would be considered successful, in the sense that they have a comfortable lifestyle, expect to retire at a time of their choosing, and, barring mishaps, should be able to enjoy their retirement doing what they wish. They run their businesses very differently, however.

It doesn’t matter what type of business you own. I coach legacy builders in manufacturing, distribution and professional services. I also coach lifestyle owners in all industries. It has a lot to do with personal vision, but the legacy builders aren’t driven by merely a “bigger” vision. They see their companies and their lives as having a different objective.

The differences are pronounced and complex enough to warrant several columns on the subject, of which this is just the first.

First, let’s define wealth, since the perception of wealth is a substantial part (although not by any means all) of the difference. A few years ago my family was skiing at Deer Valley, Utah. For those of you who haven’t been there, Deer Valley is a beautiful resort. It’s one of those that was developed as a ski resort, not as a ski mountain that eventually generated other development nearby. That means, like a golf resort, prime home sites were incorporated near the ski runs for those who could pay a premium for the location.

As you go up the main lift, the homes along the lift line are lush, and some are breathtaking. Three and four stories, 15,000 feet or more, some with indoor pools on separate glassed-in floors that are integrated into the main structure. I can’t even estimate the prices, but they are astronomical.

My younger son, who was 14 or so at the time, gaped at some of the houses as we went up. He turned to me in the chair and said, “Dad, what is rich? Friends come to our house and say ‘Boy, you are rich!” but you say we aren’t. The people who own these houses (he first thought they were small hotels) are clearly rich. What is rich?”

I took a few hours to formulate a response. That night over dinner I replied. “Son, in your public high school you have many classmates whose parents work hard at a job just to provide the necessities. When they come to our house ( an older 5 bedroom on a suburban acre) it is much more than they have, so they think we are rich.”

“There are three kinds of rich. The first is well-to-do. That’s what we are. We go out to dinner in a restaurant not just for special occasions, but whenever we don’t feel like cooking. We take vacations to see other cities, or to do fun things like ski or swim. If we need a new car, or something big fixed around the house, we just do it and don’t have to worry too much about being able to pay for it. But your mother and I both have to work very hard in the business to afford our lifestyle.”

The second kind of rich we will call ‘wealthy.’ That’s when you can live like we do, but you don’t have to go to work every day to make it possible.”

“The third kind of rich we’ll call “escape velocity.” (I think that term was coined by Bill Gates, who is probably the epitome of it.) That’s when you can pretty much do anything you want every day, and when you go to sleep you still have more money than when you woke up.”

Lifestyle business owners have reached the second kind of rich, or are approaching it. Legacy builders are seeking much more, and it isn’t merely about money. (Escape velocity depends on factors that few business owners can control.)

Next, we will look at the lifestyle of a lifestyle owner, and what your business needs to make that possible.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Exit Options, Exit Planning, Leadership, Life After | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alternative Lines of Communication

You are unhappy with an employee’s performance. Following good management practice (praise in public, criticize in private), you meet with him one-on-one to tell him that he is not making the grade. His current project is far behind schedule. His direct reports aren’t productive. His numbers are slipping. Unless he improves, you may decide he’s not the person for the job.

He leaves the meeting with a clear idea of what he needs to do to satisfy your expectations. You have delivered an unpleasant message in a supporting, objective manner. You have been a good boss.

What happens next?

With modern communications, there is a high likelihood that the content of that private meeting is distributed widely, with the employee’s slant on it rather than yours.

Maybe he posts a message on his Facebook wall. “Got reamed at work today. So unfair. I beat my brains out for this company and all they want is more.” Or he tweets to his friends, “Boss just ripped me a new one. Too bad he didn’t give me the people I need to do the job.” Or he emails his colleagues, “Mr. Big is on the war path. Be ready for him to come down on you.”

Or, he calls in his direct reports and tells them they have to shape up and get on track. Then one or more of them distributes similar messages to his friends.

The days when you controlled the lines of communication are long gone. I’m old enough to remember when companies audited their long distance telephone bills to make sure no one was making unauthorized calls. Now the cost isn’t enough to be worth having someone look at it. Most companies don’t review emails; there are simply too many of them. A few restrict Internet usage, but most employees have the same capabilities at home as they do on the job.

The Internet has privatized company-wide communications. Now every employee has the ability to distribute mass information through the organization; a role that was once limited to the realm of memos from the top. Such communication isn’t discrete. With the mixing of business and personal relationships through social media, such messages might be going out to customers and vendors as well.

What can you do? You can’t stop it, but you should be proactive and preemptive in controlling the communications environment. Confidential now means face to face. I’ve learned to write emails with an attitude that assumes every one could wind up on a bulletin board somewhere. I also start a new email if the back-and-forth response extends beyond a couple of quick answers. Too often a different topic of conversation lurks in the forgotten first few messages of a string.

Psychological studies show that people give far more credibility to the first version of a story. The second version is always compared to the “truth” as they knew it from the first hearing. Differences are taken skeptically, unless the second teller has a far stronger and more personal connection with the recipient.

The best defense is a good offense. Use communication tools to reach out to employees constantly. Help them to grow accustomed to hearing things from you, and trusting in you to keep them informed. Leadership in the age of unlimited communication is all about being the best communicator. It’s one more thing to add to your ownership responsibilities, but it’s not one you can afford to shirk.

Remember, if you aren’t telling the employees what they need to know, someone else will happily assume the role for you.

Posted in Leadership, Management, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Why is San Antonio Bucking the Trend?

The national economy is recovering, but it has a long way to go. Residential and commercial foreclosures, consumer debt levels, and bloated public pensions will take some time to correct. Yet San Antonio has been named as one of the least affected cities in America, as well as one of the best positioned in the world to prosper in a recovery.

How does this “tale of two economies” (see my previous blog) come about? How does a city with limited resources, long a national backwater, charge to the fore in adverse economic conditions? Like most such things, some of it is luck. Much of it, however, has been accomplished by following some basic principles that apply to any business.

San Antonio isn’t a economic powerhouse. No one locates here to be in the middle of what’s happening, like they would in Chicago, New York or Los Angeles. Cost of living is relatively low (93 on the COLA index, against San Jose’s 158) but much of that is housing prices. You can only save so much on food and gas. As a market, it is unimpressive:

#7 in city population
#7 in percentage of obese population
#28 MSA (between Orlando and Kansas City)
#37 in television viewers (between Greenville NC and West Palm Beach)
#175 in average household income

So what has attracted a dozen projects that each, by itself, would be the envy of most US cities? Everyone offers tax relief and incentives. How does San Antonio generate employment, construction and infrastructure when so many cities are struggling to just maintain their population?

First, let’s discuss the lucky part and get it out of the way. Lyndon Johnson used his influence with the military-industrial complex to get lots of goodies for Texas. While SA took a huge hit early in the BRAC rounds (the closing of Kelly AFB) they more than made up for it with the very last round, which transferred all medical training in the Armed Forces to Fort Sam Houston and Brooks Army Medical Center.

The military has another effect. Retired officers, well trained and well educated, are able to fill thousands of private and public sector jobs for salaries and benefits that are subsidized by their military pensions.

San Antonio is also lucky in that it loses little productivity to weather. One attractive feature in the pitch to employers is lost days due to weather. For snow, ice, hurricanes, earthquakes, or tornadoes- none. For rain, one day every couple of years. To an employer who had to shut down for 5 days after a hurricane, or just had his third snow closure of the season, that sounds pretty good.

But the lucky part of the story is only a small piece of it. Mostly SA gets business because it runs like a business.

Strategy: While less than perfectly synchronized, most of the city leadership (both public and private) has agreed on the major areas to be pursued (manufacturing, health care, biotechnology, information security.)

Management: Saddled with a term limit law (recently changed) that put a revolving door on the mayor’s office, the power shifted to the County Judge (Nelson Wolff- 10 years,) and the City Manager (Sheryl Sculley, 5 years.) Both are competent, knowledgeable, and aggressive in seeking out potential deals. The last few mayors have been only too happy to cooperate when asked. This structure allows continuity through long negotiations, even when those talks span multiple election cycles.

Sales: As more than one company has said: “When we put out our short list of potential relocation sites, San Antonio was the only one who’s leaders flew out immediately to see what we needed.” It amazes me every time I read it. What part of paying attention to the customer have the rest of the cities forgotten? SA has a reputation for building the liaison team with the people the company needs, be they from education, industry or government. They also recruit past transferees from the same industry for testimonials. All merely classic sales techniques. (I should mention that Nelson Wolff is a former small business owner.)

Labor: This encompasses a number of areas. Of course, Texas is a right to work state with low union membership. More than merely offering a non-organized workforce, however, it means that new development doesn’t have to negotiate with unions to build facilities or sign with vendors.

For a long time San Antonio’s old guard thought that maintaining a low wage base was their competitive advantage. In the last 10 years, that has changed dramatically, and the new jobs aren’t in call centers any more. The employers being targeted have changed as the city demographics have changed. The textile and light assembly work in San Antonio moved out of the country. The city learned its lesson in the late 80’s and early 90’s, and realized that low wages were only a short-term advantage.

Taxes: Texas, and particularly San Antonio, has an unusually use-based tax structure. There is no state income tax. On a local level, revenue comes from three major sources: property tax, sales tax and the city’s ownership of the power utility.

Property taxes are high, but optional. If you want to keep your taxes low, don’t own an expensive home. The property tax burden also serves as a limiter on residential inflation. Of course, sales tax is easily avoided if you don’t buy things (like most places, food and most services are exempt.) Energy and water rates are high, but conservation there also makes the portion that supports the city budget at least partially optional. 

So a target company that wants to relocate gets the following pitch. “We’d love to have you. let us come out and talk about what you need. We’ll put a team together to make it happen, and put you in touch with folks in your industry that made the move before you. We can offer stable political, economic and environmental conditions, and after you pay your expenses and the Feds, the rest of your profit is yours. The same goes for your employees. Those that move with you will get a raise in their take-home paycheck, and a lower cost of living at the same time.”

It’s a straight business pitch. What’s for a business person not to like?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *