The Third Factor- A Third Eye?

For several years my writing and speaking has focused on two factors that are indispensable for entrepreneurs; creativity and tenacity.

Creativity is the drive that not only makes entrepreneurs see opportunities, but also makes them consider every problem or challenge as solvable. It is the part of the business that entrepreneurs enjoy so much. That’s why so many of them are poor managers.

Tenacity is the refusal to accept failure. Any successful entrepreneur has been told at some time that it just won’t work. Most have felt at some point that things were hopeless. The phenomenon is widespread enough to have axioms that entrepreneurs use frequently. “When the going gets tough, the tough get going.” Or Nietzsche’s “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”

These two traits come together often. Let’s call it “tenacious creativity.” When faced with challenges, entrepreneurs think of solutions. If the solution doesn’t work, they think of another, and another, and another. That’s how they survive long enough to become successful.

The Third Eye
The other day my friend and client, Steve O’Donnell of Hill Country Bakery, offered a third required trait: the ability to navigate in the fog. What a great way to phrase it!

Some folks call it vision, but it is more than just knowing where you want your business to go. It’s knowing how to get it there without sign posts. It’s understanding innately what will get you closer to your goals and what won’t. It’s knowing when to listen to advice, and when to ignore it. It’s having a sense of direction in your gut that lets you instinctively choose the right path.

Many religions have the third eye concept. It appears in Taoism, Hinduism, Confucism and Gnostic Christianity. It refers to an instinctive knowledge that can’t be explained by the usual five senses. It may be clairvoyance, or psychic vision, or foretelling the future. It may be all of those things.

But the Third Eye is clearly part of what makes an entrepreneur successful.

Somehow, when Steve said it, I just knew he was right.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

3 Responses to The Third Factor- A Third Eye?

  1. Bobbi says:

    What a great post! I’m currently working with an entrepreneur who listens to everyone but herself. I can’t seem to make her understand that, while it’s great to seek advice and suggestions, you can’t always listen to everything everyone says.

    • John F. Dini says:

      Thanks Bobbi. All too often a business owner tries to do everything that might work. The third eye is developed by creating both a personal vision (“What do I want my life to look like when my company is successful?”) and a company vision. Take a look at the Simon Sinek video at TED.com

  2. Great Tips, thanks for sharing with us. Especially the way you put together notes on third eye makes sense and in closing you were talking about religion, which brought many memories, where GOD has opened his third eye (my parents used to tell lot of mytholigical stories). Once again thanks for sharing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

When a Good Employee Fails

One of the most difficult challenges facing any entrepreneur is correcting a prior promotion that didn’t work out.

Sooner or later it happens to every business owner. You promote employees because they’ve worked hard, were senior in their position, or showed a lot of ambition. You had an opening for someone who could handle more responsibility, and you tapped the best resource available. Before too long, you realize that you’ve made a mistake, and you’ve put someone in a job they just can’t do.

Perhaps you overestimated his or her abilities. Often the company has simply grown beyond them. Either way, is there any way to fix the problem without losing a good employee?

Faced with an uncomfortable situation, many owners choose to approach the problem obliquely. They restructure to shift responsibilities to other managers, who may resent having to cover for their underperforming colleague. Some owners let the problem slide until it is intolerable, and then embark on a progressive warning and discipline process, knowing full well that they are merely seeking an excuse to push the employee out the door without feeling too guilty about it.

Although either of these options is undesirable, every boss “knows” that you can’t demote employees and keep them happy and productive. Sometimes, however, it can be done. It’s not fun, and it isn’t easy, but you have to make a choice. Would you prefer losing a good employee, or facing a little discomfort to retain a valuable team member?

Handling a Demotion

The biggest obstacle in any demotion is psychological. Not only does the employee think he has been publicly branded as a failure, but you probably feel he’s let you down as well. If the demotion isn’t handled well, every additional day on the job can be a source of embarrassment for both of you in front of coworkers. By eliminating these psychological barriers to repositioning, you might be able to save a good worker who was a valuable asset in his or her former position.

First, accept your own responsibility in making an unsuccessful personnel move. You knew what was expected in the new position. Did you really analyze whether the employee had the appropriate skills, experience and temperament to handle it, or did you make the move because it was the easiest course of action? Did you objectively asses the employee’s ability and experience, or did you promote on attitude, hoping that the skills would catch up later?

The only possible way to reverse a bad promotion is to publicly shoulder the blame. You have to announce to the employees (and possibly to others outside the company) that you made a mistake. You took an excellent employee whom you wanted to recognize, and you put him into a position without the training and resources he or she needed to succeed.

Discuss the move with the employee first. Make it plain to him and especially to others that there will be other opportunities for advancement in the future. Thank him for his excellent work in the past, and express how happy you are that he will be once again playing a key role on your team, by using his abilities to the best advantage. Explain that you want him to succeed, and need him in a position where that success is assured.

Of course, you will sacrifice some of your aura of owner infallibility. It often seems easier to just blame the employee, and remove your mistake from everyone’s view via termination. You have a choice between saving your own ego and saving a good performer who once had a positive influence on your bottom line. Which is more likely to contribute to the success of your business?

Open Communication

No one is perfect. You have control over the job, its duties, and whom you select to perform it. If a good employee fails, it’s because you made a mistake. I am excepting, of course, the occasional idiotic move of promoting a marginal employee to see if he “steps up” with greater responsibility. In that case, you made an even bigger mistake.

Communication is critical throughout the process. Tell the employee why you are advancing him or her, and exactly what is expected in the new position. Be honest with him (and yourself) about any weaknesses that need to be addressed for a successful transition. Meet regularly to give feedback and direction. If you do that, the employee is more likely to approach you with concerns about suitability long before you need to take uncomfortable action.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Life Imitates Art

I finally got around to seeing “Atlas Shrugged- Part I” this week. I went with a friend who is as much a fan of the book as I am.

You really have to begin any critique of the movie by discussing its relationship to the book. Although Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” is probably the most influential book in my life (I’ve read it 5 times), it isn’t great literature. The characters aren’t well developed. The heroes are larger than life, and the villians are without redeeming values. The plot is linear, and takes considerable time to develop the major points, sidetracked as it is by periodic polemics.

The second problem is the fan base and the rights ownership. The book is controlled by the Ayn Rand Institute, who has always insisted on substantial control of any movie. The fan base is fanatic. It shows in the critics ratings of 13% on Rotten Tomatoes, compared with the 11,000 fan ratings which average 81%. These fans wanted to see the book exactly as written, much like the followers of Lord of the Rings.

They got what they wanted with only some minor tweaking. Thank goodness the pseudo-rape scenes every time Dagney has relations have been tenderized. Necessary updates in technology are seamless. Cell phones are ubiquitous. (Why do Dagney and Hank drive an undisguised Toyota? A slap at the UAW?)

So what results is more of a book-on-video than something written for the screen. It’s like some older movies where a Broadway play is just acted out in front of a camera. This is a clearly a book where the characters “come to life.”

Compression of a huge book into a movie, even a movie in three parts, is always a challenge of editing and time. Parts of the movie feel like the plot is just being described. “Say, there’s Frisco D’Antonia” (a Mexican in the film) “He has the San Sebastian Mines. I invested because he always makes money.” (2 minutes later on TV) “Special News Report- The San Sebastian Mines have collapsed!”

It’s low budget ($20 million). The multiple helicopter shots of a train going through the mountains are filler. There are a few anomalies- like the first John Galt run being a modern Amtrak liner. One critic compared it to a made-for-TV movie. While some locations are really good, these filler shots sometimes give it that feel.

Official Movie Soundtrack

The politics, however, are just as fresh in the movie as they remain in the 54 year old book. There is less suspension of disbelief at the back room dealing, corrupt lobbying or blatant manipulation of the law to favor insiders than was needed in 1957. A lot less.

It’s also eerily familiar to watch the media witch hunt that surrounds Reardon Metal. No facts, no evidence, no real data is necessary to publicize the “opinions” of unnamed “experts.” Opponents with obvious political and financial agendas are given air time to describe their concerns about “the public good.”

This is where, I thought while watching, life most imitates art. The virulent trashing of the movie (it’s first week in release, the Rotten Tomato critic meter had it at 6% approval- an unheard-of low rating), was completely out of proportion to what it is. Here are a few comments:

  • “An eye-rollingly clumsy amble through a Middle Earth of Monopolists for the rest of us.”
  • “Ayn Rand’s monumental 1,168-page, 1957 novel gets the low-budget, no-talent treatment and sits there flapping on screen like a bludgeoned seal.”
  • “This Sharktopus-budget-level cheap, badly-acted, clumsily-written and stiffly-directed movie…”
  • “Serves up a perfect society based on abdication by the rest of us to a snobby affluent egghead elite, in a sort of brazen brainocracy.”

Wait a minute. What happened to the impartial expertise of the movie critic? Since when do they rant about the subject of the movie? In the name of free speech, critics are more than willing to forgive brutality, gore, sadism, rape, gratuitous sex, corruption and deceit. When did they start trashing a film’s point of view?

Atlas Shrugged-Part I” isn’t a great film. It probably isn’t even a very enjoyable movie for non-Rand fans. It is not, however, “Ishtar,” “Battlefield Earth,” or “Heaven’s Gate.” It’s merely a simple story made from a simple (if exhaustingly long) book.

Could the fact that 85% of media employees self-identify as “liberal” have anything to do with it? Is this a Reardon-Metal style smear campaign to influence public opinion? Perish the thought. No one can believe that such things actually happen in real life…right?

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Life Imitates Art

  1. Joe Zente says:

    John,

    Great article, profound observations, phenomenal book.

    Thanks for sharing…

    Joe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cancer in the Workplace

It was my first ownership of a business. I had moved to California to take over a failing auto parts distributor, and the deal came with a minority share in the business. I was just 30 years old.

The housecleaning that preceded my arrival included the entire sales team, and I needed knowledgeable parts people fast. I found one in New York, a dealership parts manager who had been fired. Another was from Florida, and a third in New Jersey. All of them worked hard, and we were pretty successful.

After a while, however, I had a new problem. My staff didn’t seem to take me seriously. I knew my stuff technically. Although my management skills were limited, I had trained with a large corporation just a few years before, and understood the basics of working with people. They just didn’t seem to listen to me. Every new process took multiple iterations to get in place, and then they seemed to evaporate again as soon as I turned my back.

It took a long time to learn what the problem was. My business had a cancer. The new York salesman was doing everything in his power to undermine me, but was smart enough to keep it out of sight.

He had purchased a house not far from the business, and every afternoon was a free happy hour at his place. The warehouse workers, salespeople and administrative team were welcome for beers and snacks. Many nights it turned into a BBQ dinner.

While the employees drank beer in his backyard, Mr. NY would hold court. He was a typical salesperson in that he knew how to tell a story, had a great sense of humor, and a keen eye for sarcasm. Unfortunately, my company and I were the target. He could do impressions of me, and scathing analyses of every minor problem in the business, which of course all traced to my incompetence.

It took a long time to find out what was happening. In the workplace he was my most productive employee and, on the surface the most loyal. He was always willing to help, and would pitch in on any job. Once he left the office, however, he became Mr. Hyde, pouring venom on the day’s activities in an hour-by-hour recitation.

Did I fire him? No. I was young and inexperienced. I kept looking for a way to “catch” him doing something wrong at work. I told myself that what he and the other employees did on their own time was none of my business. I was afraid to lose my top producer. He outlasted me at the company, although he never got my job (possibly his objective,)

This is an extreme illustration of a cancerous employee, but milder versions are widespread. It’s not just the employee with a “bad attitude,” the one who doesn’t quite get along with anyone else. It’s the jokester, the stand-up comic, the wit who sees a kind of nasty humor in everything. He raises an eyebrow behind you in a meeting, or stifles a laugh when reading a memo. He (or she) plays to the crowd.

It’s difficult to keep people excited about their work, and easy to drag them down. One cancerous employee can ruin an entire company if left unmolested. It can’t be corrected by warnings or penalties, that only drives it further underground. Like a cancer, it can only be cut out of the system, and the sooner the better.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Big Brother is So 2000, but…

Big Brother is Old News

This could easily be a post about technology invading our lives. How we are watched and examined and manipulated through out electronic connectedness. But why? If you aren’t aware of the erosion of your privacy and risk to your financial security by now, this blog isn’t going to help you.

I wanted to mention some really cool, or really worrisome (depending on your viewpoint) uses of tracking technology that I’ve discovered recently. I may be on the trailing edge when figuring some of this stuff out, but I’ll bet you weren’t aware of all four, or at least not to the point of thinking how they might affect your business.

The first is using your web visitor information for business intelligence. Hopefully we are all tracking how many visitors come to our sites and what they look at. What I didn’t realize is that the technology now allows us to drill down to the individual visitor level, and to identify who that visitor was.

So what? Well, I have a client who is pitching a large multinational on a new program. He is getting a good reception from the folks he’s dealing with, but he knows that it has to go further up the ladder for approval. In back tracking his visitors’ URLs, he noticed one that traced to the prospect’s European headquarters. A little further digging showed multiple and lengthy visits by a corporate officer. That’s a handy thing to know when it’s negotiation time.

Another neat piece of business help is in digital documents. There are two examples here. The first is online document storage. You can place electronic documents in a secure online file, and only those authorized can gain entry. These services have been improving over the last 5 years. Where you formerly just gave a password to a user and hope they respected it, now you can demand digital ID from each individual on every entry.

Another up-and-comer for easier business dealings is digital signature via phone. How many of you are near a fax right now? How many are near a mobile phone? If you don’t have a fax handy, you probably aren’t near a scanner either. Document signing services like Echosign (www.echosign.com) allow you to execute legal documents with your finger on the phone’s touch screen.

But He Keeps on Coming

Moving a bit further into big bro’ land, we must consider the bounties being paid by the repo man. Used car repo companies now sign up hunters to take photos of license plates and upload them to their web portal. The hunters include a description of where the car was seen (WalMart Parking lot on Main.) Computers process the plate pictures, and send a notification when one is identified as “hot.” No word on what happens to the thousands of license plate pictures that the computer doesn’t care about.

OK, I have to say it. This last one is really, really big brotherish, even if the technology is widespread and not even unusual anymore. Allstate is offering a new version of Good Driver discounts. They will track you with GPS, and give you a reduction in rates for driving at the speed limit, or driving only limited miles, or only in good neighborhoods. Their pitch is “Why pay for insurance you don’t really need?”

Of course, insurance companies exist to make money. Might this technology also be used to identify fast drivers or those who park in dark palces at night? I don’t know, but I’m not signing up for that one any time soon.

Are there any other cool tech uses for small business out there? Add them on in comments.

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *