Entrepreneurs Love Paperwork

Entrepreneurs love paperwork. Not. The truth is that most entrepreneurs hate paperwork with a passion otherwise reserved for the college team that ran up the score on their alma mater year in and year out.

If I want to get a guaranteed laugh in a presentation to business owners, I describe a scene set in their office. You are talking with an employee, sitting behind your 96 inch wide Rosewood desk, admiring the unbroken expanse of its mirror-like finish. That opening doesn’t really lead to any story, because I’ve obviously destroyed any credibility with my fantastic description.

Paperwork is a term we use to describe something we don’t like to do. If you are an engineer, working on a plan isn’t paperwork; it’s engineering. If you are a financial planner, reviewing someone’s portfolio isn’t paperwork; it is planning. So paperwork is different things to different people, but it universally describes something we’d rather not be doing.

As an entrepreneur grows his or her business, paperwork is often the first thing to be delegated. You hire an assistant, or a bookkeeper, or someone to do the invoicing. Your logic is inescapable. The less time you spend on paperwork, the more time there is for generating revenue.

Unfortunately, this antipathy toward repetitive and uninteresting administrative tasks too often extends to documentation that only you can do as the owner of the company. Job descriptions, performance reviews, procedures and business plans become lumped into the general classification of “paperwork.” These are critical tasks that are all too easily postponed indefinitely without doing visible damage to the operation.

There are two reasons for ducking these tasks. The first is a general dislike of spending time on things you don’t do well. There is no pressing need or obvious benefit to carve time out of a busy day to address process issues. No employees are standing idle while awaiting a job description. Your business plan starts with revenue, so time spent on generating revenue is obviously more productive than time spent on deciding what to do with it. You discuss customer service and quality every day, so why would you need to write down a mission, vision, or core values statement?

The second reason, and perhaps the more influential one psychologically, is the entrepreneur’s resistance to putting things in tight little boxes. You didn’t start your own business so that you could run by a rule book. You did it so you could control what happens around you. Documenting how things are to be done commits you, as the owner and leader of your company, to doing them that way. It’s just another box, even if it is one you built yourself.

The first reason, that the effort is unnecessary, is simply wrong. You owe your employees and customers a clear understanding of what to expect, and what the results should be time after time. That comes from your systems. If you don’t accept the responsibility of defining those systems, who will? Look around your business. Who, if not you, is better suited to deciding what people should be doing, and what your company should be delivering to the people who pay you?

The second reason, that the effort confines your freedom to act, is a misunderstanding.  You document policies, procedure and plans for other people. Your role in the business doesn’t change. You are still the Chief Innovation Officer. It is your job to continually look for better methods and to generate new ideas. Just because you have documented a way to do something doesn’t freeze experimentation or all future changes. In fact, doing so would be failing your responsibility as an entrepreneur.

Picture Credit

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thinking Isn’t Doing

My friend Phil owns a mobile imaging company. His employees criss-cross the major cities in South Texas in dozens of trucks outfitted with portable X-Ray and ultrasound machines, responding to calls from nursing homes and home health providers.

In th beginning, like so many of us, Phil was a one-man show. An Army veteran, he was making a good living as a salesman of portable X-Ray machines when Hillarycare, or the threat of it, dried up new equipment sales. Phil bought a used machine from a customer, and began peddling his service from nursing home to nursing home.

For facilities that take care of seniors who are by definition frail, having a procedure come to you is a huge benefit. Aged patients aren’t all that mobile to start with, and a doctor’s order for an X-Ray probably means that there has been a fall or some other injury, complicating the process of getting the patient dressed and transporting him or her to an imaging center. Phil’s business grew quickly, and he soon had 5 trucks on the road.

But Phil was a licensed X-Ray tech himself (a benefit, along with an MBA, from his military service) and still often had to deliver services personally. It was while doing this that he experienced a moment that I’ve always thought defines the difference between an entrepreneur and the rest of the crowd.

One night in the middle of the week, the tech who was responsible for taking after-hours call phoned in sick. Knowing that the chance of getting one of his other employees to volunteer was minimal, Phil decided (as he often did) to just take the calls himself. It was a weeknight, and there was a decent probability that there would be no activity at all.

Of course, that’s not how things worked out. At about 2:00 in the morning (my favorite time!) there was a call for an emergency X-Ray. In this case, it wasn’t from a nursing home, but rather from a small, rural hospital that didn’t staff its imaging department at night. There had been an automobile accident, and they needed X-Rays of a victim before transferring him to a larger facility.

Phil dutifully packed up the truck and drove 35 miles to the hospital. He unloaded the portable X-Ray, and wheeled it in through the front door.

Few places are much quieter than a rural hospital at 3:00 AM. The only sign of life was an elderly fellow pushing the ubiquitous floor polisher around the hallways. Phil asked for and received directions to the emergency room. As he walked away, the maintenance man stopped him.

“What’s that you’ve got there?” he asked. “It that a portable X-Ray machine?” Phil said that it was. “And you take it from place to place when people need X-Rays?” Phil again confirmed that was what he was doing.

“Phew,” the man said, waving his hand dismissively, “I had that idea twenty years ago.”

Phil moved on, suddenly feeling a bit better about having to be out at 3:00 AM delivering services for his own business. After all, if he wasn’t, he might have been polishing floors.

Lot’s of people have good ideas. Only a few believe in them enough to act.

Posted in Entrepreneurship | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Thinking Isn’t Doing

  1. LOL! You remembered!

    Thanks John!

    Phil

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Left Behind

As business owners, most of us understand that the people who help us get our company to one level may not be the folks who can get it to the next. A great salesman may not be your next sales manager. The sales manager who can supervise and mentor a half-dozen reps may not be able to create your sales process training for a national team. The national sales manager may not be the strategist who can identify and develop horizontal markets.

So it is also with outside professional advisors. When your business is just starting out, you have a clear criteria for retaining a professional. He or she is usually the cheapest one you can find. Then your business begins to grow. A few years later, if you are lucky, you are bringing in millions of dollars of revenue, and employing dozens or scores of people.

At that level, you are far too experienced to seek professional wisdom solely on price. You understand that the folks who charge the least usually have a reason. The ones who charge the most have a reason too. Yet your now-substantial enterprise is still running with the help of the cheapest professional you could find when you were a fraction of this size.

The two ubiquitous consultants for any business are the attorney and the CPA. In my book “11 Things You Absolutely Need to Know About Selling Your Business” I relate the sad stories of estate attorneys, divorce attorneys and litigation attorneys who have been asked to handle business transactions beyond their expertise. Unfortunately, the glut of unemployed lawyers in the market leads any number of them to take all the work they can find, and their license allows that to happen without penalty.

You know, a medical license allows a physician to perform any medical procedure as well, but none would dare practice outside their training. I wonder why lawyers can regularly screw up things for which they weren’t qualified, but their profession does little or nothing about it?

Even more frequently, I see accountants whose client has long ago outgrown their skills and capabilities. These are companies who need to be advised about investment tax credits, research credits, buy vs. lease decsions, and hiring incentives, but whose accountants roll merrily along preparing basic tax returns that leave thousands of dollars in the IRS’ pocket unnecessarily.

There are many competent solo accountants, but I’ve never met one that could handle all the needs of a complex organization. I’m regularly surprised by owners who brag that their $5,000,000 business still pays $700 for a tax return. Do they think that’s buying them top-shelf services?

I knew a retailer who was rapidly expanding. His solo and very inexpensive home-based CPA got pregnant. She filed an extension for his tax return, then another, then a third. Finally she filed a special “It’s my fault, not the taxpayers” professional extension. (I’d never heard of that one.) All that time he kept right on building new stores.

By the time she finished the tax returns, it was a year after he had closed his books. Most of his expansion had been done under with the wrong kind of contracts, with the wrong leases, and with a misunderstanding of how depreciation worked. Too late, he found out that he owed the IRS hundreds of thousands of dollars from the previous year just as he opened his biggest store ever. Negotiating a tax payment plan consumed all of his working capital, and the new operation had to start in an untested market without any advertising budget.

That store failed. His CPA had never discussed why he should isolate his risk by separating the new venture from his other, profitable operations. He lost everything.

That’s one story of a business owner paying the price for using an advisor who couldn’t keep up with his business. I have another, and another, and more after that.

Right sizing your outside services should be instinctive. You wouldn’t have a 30 gallon aluminum garbage can for a manufacturing plant. When the garbage starts to pile up, you get a dumpster. It’s just a cost of doing business. Why would you stick with professionals whom you’ve long ago outgrown?

Picture Credit

Posted in Entrepreneurship | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Is It All About the Money?

If you have more than ten employees, and an outside observer (like me) asks them confidentially to say in one word what their boss cares about the most, what do you think they will answer?

We’d like to think that answer will be “quality.” Or perhaps you might prefer “service,” or “customers,” or “employees” or “vision” or “culture.”

I often get the opportunity to ask that question indirectly because I coach the owner of a company, but in many cases may also be teaching a management class or leading a key executive group with his or her employees. Do you know what they think the answer is? “Money.”

I know very few business owners whose first concern is money. They aren’t fixated on it, but it just seems to always be the topic of conversations with employees. Take this conversation between an owner and a manager last week (slightly disguised for anonymity).

Q: “Why didn’t you get the compliance reports done for the last two operating periods?”

A: “I was covering shifts for an employee who called in sick.”

Q: “Why didn’t you bring in an on-call person?”

A: “No one wanted to do it for $10 an hour.”

Q:” Why didn’t you offer more?”

A: “Because that job pays $10 an hour.”

Q: “But when you are doing it, I’m paying you $24 an hour, and the compliance work isn’t getting done. Wouldn’t offering $12 or even $15 an hour to someone have made more sense?”

A: ” I thought you said that taking care of the customer came before anything else.”

It’s two different conversations. The employee is pleading that his priority is service. The boss isn’t disagreeing, but is pointing out that the delivery method chosen wasn’t cost effective. The employee only hears “money,” which in his mind is mutually exclusive with service.

The perceived conflict exists in most businesses.  For the owner, taking care of the customer is of primary importance. He also realizes that he can’t take care of customers (or employees for that matter) for very long if he is losing money on each transaction.

It happens at every level. A master’s degreed employee recently told me “The boss says he can’t afford to have me wasting non-billable hours on side projects. I get paid $60 an hour. When he bills for me, it is at $150 an hour. I could be unbilled for two days every week and he’d still be fine. He just wants to make as much as he can.”

Actually, after overhead and benefits, if the employees were unbilled for even one day a week the company would quickly be out of business. The effort of explaining the cost dynamics of the business, employee by employee, month after month, is too exhausting for most employers.

So we resort to shorthand, telling them just what they need to know. “If we don’t get revenues up, there will be no raises.” “We have to cut expenses, we aren’t making a decent profit.” “We have to get higher margins.” We have to work smarter, because we can’t afford to hire more people.”

The employees hear you, and think “All he cares about is the money.”

I’m not Pollyanna. I don’t believe that the employees would understand a whole lot better if we had weekly meetings where we only talked about quality and service, and never mentioned profit. On the other hand, the companies who say that they just focus on doing the job right and let profits take care of themselves are frequently, although not always, short-lived.

This is more of a reminder. We need to talk to employees about costs and profits, but we also need to talk about why and how those fit with the rest of our vision for the business.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

An Army of One

Hollywood has done an excellent job of defining what it takes to be an action hero. George Smiley, the grey civil servant of John Le Carre’s spy novels, is a protagonist, but not a hero. Heroes are cast in a distinct behavioral pattern. Bruce Willis, Mel Gibson, and Harrison Ford characters represent the archetype I’m describing.

We use the DISC behavioral profiles with all of our clients. Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that the factors that make a Hollywood hero also appear in many of the business owners we work with. The question is; do Hollywood action heroes make good entrepreneurs? Consider the action hero behavioral profile.

High D. The high Dominant personality solves challenges by overcoming them, as opposed to circumnavigation. A high-D entrepreneur takes things head on, and seeks immediate results. Action is usually more important than direction. Think about Harrison Ford’s Indiana Jones. When told that the Ark of the Covenant is on a truck to Cairo, he grabs a horse. Is that the best plan for catching a truck? Probably not, but it is the first action available.

High I. The high Influencer uses language and verbal communication to influence those around him. John McClane, the cop from Die Hard, never shuts up. He rails at the cops, at the villain, at himself, and even maintains a running commentary while he is fighting for his life with the bad guys.

Low S. The Steadiness measurement indicates a tendency towards planning, teamwork and supportiveness. Martin Riggs, Mel Gibson’s character in Lethal Weapon, is a typical loner hero. While he has personal loyalty to his partner, that loyalty isn’t sufficient to keep him from getting them both into trouble regularly, something he does without consulting Murtaugh, and often despite his partner’s protestations.

Low C. The Compliance factor relates to how well you follow the rules. The low C hates the rules; they merely handcuff his ability to act. There are hundreds of examples. “You can take my badge, you can take my gun (I have another- which is of course against the rules), you can take me off the case, you can revoke my 00 license to kill, but you can’t stop me from doing what I think I need to do.”

The low-C also refuses to consider risk in his decision process. Consider Han Solo’s response to C3PO’s calculation of the probability of surviving a flight through an asteroid field. “Never tell me the odds.”

Have I described any entrepreneurs that you know? Of course I have. It takes action, focus, fast talking and usually some risky decisions to start a small business. The problem arises when the action hero entrepreneur becomes successful. Taking your organization beyond the “Army of One” phase requires a different set of behaviors. Those who don’t adapt find themselves stuck at their maximum personal capacity, and can’t bring their organizations to the next level.

James Bond will never get M’s job. Han Solo may marry Princess Leia, but he will never sit next to her in planning meetings. At last count, Martin Riggs and John McClane have been stuck at the same detective pay grade for eleven and nineteen years respectively.

In Jim Collin’s Good to Great (in my opinion one of the three best business books ever written), he talks about the level 5 leader. The level 5 goes beyond the cult of personality, leading with a steady hand and singular focus on long term improvement.

That may work in large organizations, but it’s far more difficult in an owner-run small business. When every employee sees the owner each day, he or she has to exhibit substantial charisma and verbal influence. If you want to grow to an organization where the employees perform without seeing you every day, however, you will need to be more than an action hero.

 

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

2 Responses to An Army of One

  1. Victor Perlbachs says:

    Good piece. To be successful in the long run, the super hero needs to trust someone to do the day to day planning and keep the business moving forward, while he or she goes on to the next “mission impossible”.

  2. Paul says:

    Having worked in large Multi Nationals in Senior Exec roles through to Pre IPO organisations and now my own start up in the Executive Search Space, I think this article is right to the point, when are putting out grass fires all day it is hard to get time out too look out over the top of the forest, but without this time and time for planning when your baby is going to become a teenager then you will always be a Super Hero which is not necessarily bad if that is what is important to you and you make that your end game.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *