Leaner and Meaner (Part 4): Beating the Big Guys

If your small business depends on excellent employees, how can you attract and retain them against the resources of larger corporations? In our previous installments of this Leaner and Meaner series, we’ve talked about how the pressures of running a business today require accomplishing more with less. For most of us, that means employees who are very good at what they do, and who are getting better all the time.

Small businesses have a litany of reasons why they are an attractive employment alternative to big organizations. Some are true, but others are merely fantasies that an owner creates to make him- or herself feel better about not being competitive, or not hiring the best.

True Differentiators

An employee in a small business is an individual. Others in the company know who they are, and what their role is in the organization. They don’t have to search a cafeteria at lunch time to see whom they might recognize. They don’t have a job description defined by a number (level II administrative clerk) or shared with dozens of others.

cube farmPeople want to be important. Big businesses can tell people they are important, but reality intrudes when you are sitting in a cube farm that stretches to the horizon. In a small business, every employee really is a key part of the machine. It is an owner’s job to make sure that is understood, both by the employee and by his or her coworkers.

Everyone wants to make a difference. Imagine standing outside of the exit gate from a large businesses employee parking lot. Pretend you have each employee roll down the car window and answer two questions: “Did you do a good job today?” and “How do you know?”

Most will answer “Yes” to the first question, and “I don’t know” to the second. Enthusiasm for a job has to come from more than slogans and team meetings. It should be generated by an understanding of why your job is important, and how it impacts the company as a whole. A small business enjoys a tremendous advantage when communicating that information to every employee.

False Differentiators

The most frequent and least credible claim I hear from small business owners about the advantages of working in their company is “We treat everyone like family.” It is a poor differentiator because it is so true.

Most families are a least somewhat dysfunctional. Which of your employees is uncle Bob, who is only contacted about births and deaths, and happily ignored the rest of the time? Which one is cousin Brittany, whose life disasters provide ongoing grist for the gossip mill? Employees have their own families, and all the baggage that comes with them.

Social interaction, working with people you like and whose company you enjoy, is a key part of company culture. Being sociable and supporting as you would with family, instead of demanding performance, is a clear pathway to mediocrity. Worse, the best workers will leave if they feel they are supporting underperformers.

Competitive Factors

Pay: Big companies can afford to pay more than normal market rates to offset their lack of emotional rewards. That doesn’t mean small companies can pay less than market rates and make it up with culture. You have to be within the range. Check the salary scales on websites dedicated to that purpose, and make sure you keep up with the norm. Employees have real families to support.

Benefits: Health insurance isn’t an option if you want to attract top performers. You may not be able to afford a gilt-edged plan, and you may have to ask for more employee contribution that a big company does. Not offering anything however, is a guaranty that the best prospects will pass you by.

Flexibility: It is laughable that Corporate America is beating the daylights out of small business on the flexibility issues. The only reason a small business can’t compete is because the owner doesn’t want to. Tailoring some customization into schedules or duties is greatly appreciated, and really speaks to how you value an individual.

Growth: Small business usually can’t offer a “career path” of incremental advancement, but that is no reason you can’t offer employees a chance to grow and learn. The current issue of Inc. Magazine quotes Harvard Professor Teresa M. Amabile:

“Of all the things that contribute to a happy workday, the one thing that stands out from my research is making progress on meaningful work.”

Each employee is proportionately more important in a small business. Attracting people who want to be meaningful in their workplace should be a slam-dunk. Having the financial resources to compete on the rest of the issues requires you to be “leaner and meaner.” For that, you need exceptional employees. I admit that it’s a Catch 22, but you can’t build your bottom line with poor performers.

 

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Leaner and Meaner (Part 4): Beating the Big Guys

  1. I enjoyed the article, we have worked hard to bring our small business to the size and profitability to retain our top performers. Although we think of ourselves as a family we do cull the family to make room for new family members. Most of the time “family members” who are repeatable passed up will leave on their own: At times We need to let them know their future is not with us. When this happens we need to step back and rebuild the team, though recently we have the new member work for a week at a time with one trainer in their work related areas. after a month we confer with the trainers and see where their strengths are, should any of the managers feel the time investment will not pay off the individual is let go. the longer it takes to make that decision the more difficult it is to let them go–part of the family dilemma I suspect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leaner and Meaner (Part 3): Investing in Employees

Employees are free agents. As a business owner you wouldn’t sell your customers at a loss because in past years you made a profit. Neither should we expect employees to get better at their jobs without expecting compensation commensurate with their current market value.

In the wildly popular “Downton Abbey” series the kitchen maid, Daisy, is bucking for a raise and promotion. She says “I know a lot of things I didn’t know when I started here.” Mrs. Patmore, the cook, tells Daisy “Yes, but they are all things I taught you.” Daisy replies, “Well yeah, but I learned ’em!”

Gratitude is a lousy motivator. Expecting loyalty from an employee simply because you’ve taught them skills is a surefire path to turnover. In a competitive economy where you are trying to accomplish more with less (see last week’s Leaner and Meaner column) each individual on your team has to be better. The days of making up for mediocre talent by adding bodies is over.

Over 70% of the US Gross Domestic Product is from services. Services are performed by people. If you are going to increase profits faster than you increase revenues in a service business, you have to do it by having more productive employees. That means investing in them, and then keeping that investment longer for a better return.

Investing means more than wages, benefits and on-the-job training. Job benefits like support for formal education, flexible hours and training that increases job market value means the most to the best employees. Unfortunately, those are the productive workers to whom we often offer the least flexibility. In a company of mediocre workers, the ones who rise to the top are frequently the most shortchanged when it comes to additional investment.

Small business owners tend to myopia. They look at their companies as self-contained universes. If your expectation is that an employee should be gratified because he or she is compensated better than other people in your organization, or others within their department, it is time to understand that such measures are no longer valid. Employees can check the internet for comparative wages. They discuss salaries with each other, with friends and with former co-workers through social media. They are acutely aware of competitive market rates for their abilities, even if you aren’t.

Too many small business owners avoid such additional “sunk costs” for fear that they are training new competitors, or that their highest skilled employees will be pirated away by bigger companies. That is clearly a danger, but in a free market lack of investment merely dooms you to produce with assets that are less effective and less efficient than those of your competitor. That is not the road to “leaner and meaner.”

For decades, the proponents of human resource accounting have argued that businesses should capitalize the hiring and training expense of a new employee. If we amortized those costs over time, and had to write them off against profits if an employee left before they were fully recouped, we would have a very different attitude towards retention.

Increasing your competitiveness is no longer a choice; it is a necessity. Treating employees like mushrooms, keeping them in the dark about the world outside and teaching them only what they need to know for your purposes, reduces your competitiveness and increases replacement costs. The trick to creating a tough, winning organization is to build a team of talented high performers who enjoy compensation and benefits that will stand up against any other opportunity.

Small business owners cringe when I say that. They say “We can’t pay what the big guys pay!” Even more often I hear “How can I pay top wages when I don’t even make top wages?” The answer to both questions is the same, and we will delve deeper into them next week.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leaner and Meaner (Part 2): Retaining Good Employees

Last week we discussed the post-recession challenges that face business owners, and the economic and demographic shifts that mean we need to run our companies better than we ever have before.

Between 2008 and 2010 many business owners faced a task they had never previously dealt with; reducing staff. There are few things that impact the culture of a company more than layoffs. The pain for both the employees who stay and the owner who had to make the tough decisions lingers for a long time, but eventually it subsides, and the business continues. This time, continuation doesn’t mean returning to former practices.

Small businesses create almost two-thirds of the new jobs in America. As our persistent unemployment figures show, those jobs are not coming back at a rate that anyone could consider healthy. At the same time, the employers who I work with are complaining about the generally poor quality of applicants for the positions they have available. What created this anomaly?

Some of the slow job growth is caused by a reluctance to overstaff. In the event of another economic hiccup, owners want to avoid being in the same position as before; subjecting their companies to the pain of downsizing. The more important reason, however, is that in many businesses two people are now doing the work that three employees did before.

Downsizing is Darwinian. The slower and less skilled employees are dropped, and those who are more experienced and productive are retained. The net result is that any attrition going forward involves a more difficult replacement challenge than before. Running leaner usually means that the entry-level folks, the assistants and limited-task workers who provided the raw material to train for more demanding positions, are no longer there.

This missing pipeline of employees-in-training may be due to a reduction in staff, or simply because you have avoided hiring, but it is endemic in small businesses nationwide.

The other side of the coin in a leaner operation, therefore, is that when you experience inevitable turnover, the replacement employee has to be more capable than those you hired in the past. Every termination now takes with it a proportionately higher piece of a small company’s “corporate knowledge.” That experience in “How we do what we do” can’t be immediately replaced by any new hire. You now need people who know more to begin with, and can get up to speed on the remaining capabilities faster than they did before.

Most small businesses could do with a stronger recruiting and screening process, but we’ll leave that for another day. The secret to retaining the corporate knowledge of experienced employees is simple. Don’t let them leave! Like existing customers, the most valuable employees are the ones who already do a good job for you. They are the most likely candidates for new responsibilities. They have a work ethic that you know, and their ability to absorb new training is enhanced by the base of knowledge they already possess.

Owners complain that resumes today show too much “job hopping.” Younger workers have been trained to believe that opportunity requires regular job changes. Too much time in one position is considered a sign of low ambition.

I think those days are coming to an end. Longer job tenures will be partly due to a leaner hiring environment, but also because employers are realizing the need to “hang onto the good ones.” We have an obligation as employers to reorient our workforce. Tenure in a position should not only indicate dependability, but it should also reflect an employee who was worth an ongoing investment.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Leaner and Meaner (Part 2): Retaining Good Employees

  1. Stan Wyner says:

    Recruiting, retention, and downsizing should be done within the context of an overall succession plan designed not only for ownership transitions, but also “bench strength.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Does Your Business Need to be Leaner and Meaner? (Part 1)

I’ve been surprised by the tone of my clients’ conversations since the beginning of the year. They want to get tougher. They want to plan more. They want to find the chinks in their armor, and sharpen their weapons.

These are businesses that came through the Great Recession, often with flying colors. They remained profitable, and in some cases set records for income. They continued to grow. To any casual observer they became “lean and mean.” Yet the overarching theme seems to be “We still aren’t good enough yet.”

All small business owners do well by cultivating a healthy streak of paranoia. Even on an average day there are enough potholes out there to knock your company out of alignment, and a few that can take a wheel off. Even so, owners tend to dodge challenges as they arise, and not spend too much time looking down the road.

These haven’t been typical New Year’s Resolution types of conversations.  They are something deeper than that. They evidence a general uneasiness about what’s coming. While the owners hope that things will get better, they fear that they will get worse.  It’s a feeling that someone, somewhere is plotting at this moment to take their business away, and a desire to be ready before they can even identify any specific threat.

Certainly there are enough clouds on the domestic horizon to give anyone pause about the potential of the coming year. We face a dysfunctional national government, higher taxation, increased mandates for employers which will carry unknown costs, anemic job creation, global competition, and a difficult lending market.

Internationally we have Iranian atomic ambitions, North Korean missiles, a European recession, China’s growing influence and increasing instability in the Middle East. While these don’t affect most American small businesses directly, they add to the incessant drumbeat of negative information crowding the airwaves.

So is this new-found focus on getting leaner and meaner based on a realistic need for improvement, or is it merely an emotional reaction to the media’s insatiable appetite for “crisis content?” I think it is the former. Small business owners need to be more competitive, even those who have already stepped up their game considerably since 2008.

I write and speak extensively about “The Boomer Bust,” the inevitable economic impact of retiring Baby Boomers. For the last 50 years, the American economy has grown on the population bubble of a generation who were both prolific producers and voracious consumers. A rising tide lifts all boats.

Now that generation is stepping back from both production and consumption. You can’t change demographics. The four European countries with the lowest birthrate over the past 30 years are Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy. Their politicians don’t want to discuss that problem, because it is one they cannot fix. The USA has had sufficient population growth to avoid the dramatic GDP shrinkage of those countries, but we still face a decade or more of serious drag on our economy until the Millennials begin to enter the workforce in large numbers.

Our government, especially the current administration, is trying to provide a minimum standard of living and health care for both the ageing Boomers as well as for those who are marginalized by a lack of relevant education and training. They have to do it on revenues from a smaller, less productive generation caught in between. Some economists say that the recent “Fiscal Cliff” tax increases represent about one-third of the new revenue needed to accomplish this, even if we reduced spending by five times as much as currently planned.

History is inevitable. It can’t be changed. This is an effect of history, not merely of current events. I’m not deluded enough to believe that small business owners can impact the EU, or fix the Federal budget. We can only run our businesses.

I think the owners who feel the need to be better are correct. The efficiencies we engineered to survive the recession were just a start. The successful small companies of five years from now will look and function very differently. Next week we will begin to discuss how and why. I encourage my readers to pass this first installment along to other business owners who want to be among the survivors.

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

3 Responses to Does Your Business Need to be Leaner and Meaner? (Part 1)

  1. Richard Pace says:

    Excellent overall assessment… looking forward to the details.

  2. Thanks for the post. Time to put this into action instead of
    just bookmarking it.

  3. craig eastman says:

    you know john, the ever present threat to small business will, as it now seems, never reduce in size. it is a constant effort to keep one step ahead of all of the negatives, including our government and the world. Looking forward to your continued input on this matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business Plans and New Year’s Resolutions

For the last week or so, the regular denizens of my local gym have been “preparing” for the onslaught of Resolutioners, as we call them. Those are the folks that show up every year right after the holidays, determined to make the coming twelve months healthier than the last twelve.

Small business owners frequently do the same with their business plans at this time of year. They look at their previous year’s results, and determine that the coming year will be better. Every small business survey will show a high percentage of entrepreneurs who predict that the next year will be more successful. Like the Resolutioners, the real question is what will they do to make that happen?

Specific

Those who limit their objectives to good intentions are the first to disappear from the gym. They merely made a “resolution” to lose weight and exercise more (by far the most popular resolutions). Like owners who vow to sell more and spend less, their resolve has faded by the end of January. The Resolutioners decide they could just eat less to lose weight and not have to exercise. The business owners might start making excuses about spending decisions. Having determined to reduce expenses, they then decide that not cutting is the new magical formula to added sales. It seems easier, but it doesn’t accomplish the objective.

Measurable

A New Year’s resolution with a measurable target, say to lose 20 pounds, is a bit stickier than just “lose weight,” but not by much.”Increase profits by 10%” sounds more businesslike than “make more money,” but by itself is just as insubstantial. Those folks are gone by Valentine’s Day, give or take a week depending on the harshness of the winter weather.

Accountable

Some of the new gym arrivals come with a friend, a workout buddy to help keep them on track. For these, the odds of success are multiplied greatly. For a business owner, accountability needs to be more than just to yourself. A business coach, peer group, or even announcing the goals to employees and reviewing them regularly can be a big help. Even so, many will drift away as the year wears on.

Resourced

I originally tried to get my workout in the morning at the cost of sleep. Unfortunately, I’m one of those folks who needs seven hours each night or face more than my usual cognitive dissonance. I finally learned that going to bed at 10:00 was a prerequisite to getting up at 5:00 and functioning well. Trying to achieve your business goals by merely working harder (or its fallacious cousin, working “smarter”) is pointless. That is, unless you can point to how you’ve been slacking or working stupid in the past. If you can’t, then you will have to allocate real resources to the results you seek.

Timed

A year is too long a time period for practical goal setting. How many times have you said “I can’t believe 2012 went so fast?” How many times did you say that about 2011, 2010, 2009 and on and on? You need to have more frequent milestones. I recommend monthly targets for operational goals, and quarterly metrics for tactical objectives.

By March, most of the Resolutioners will be gone, and we can get back to our normal workout routines. Every year, however, a few of them stick it out and transition from being the “new guys” to one of the “old guys.” Eventually we will learn their names, and accept them into the brotherhood of those who have proven to be tenacious and disciplined enough to change their lifestyles permanently.

The same thing happens in business. There is a brotherhood or sisterhood of business owners who plan carefully, and who make the effort to stick to the plan’s execution.  Outsiders call them the wealthy.

Posted in Entrepreneurship | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Business Plans and New Year’s Resolutions

  1. Stan McBroom says:

    How true, with no measurement and someone to hold you accountable you will be back to your old ways in no time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *