Help Your Friends, Not Your Competitors’

I hear it all too often. “A customer just called us for a quote. They have always done business with our competitor. We’re going to give them our best deal, and see if we can take their business.”

Before you do anything, the first thing to ask is why they are calling you. Many reasons won’t indicate that your best price (and lowest margin) are called for.

Perhaps your competitor is out of stock or at capacity, in which case all you’ve done is pass up an opportunity to maximize the value of a one-time sale. If their vendor relationship is strong, they are unlikely to leave merely for price, at least not without asking their currently supplier to match it.

Are they having a disagreement with your competitor? The appropriate response may lie with delivery times, shipping costs or service levels, not price.

Has the customer been cut off for slow or non-payment? In that case, you are merely relieving your competitor of a problem account.

Did the competitor just initiate a price increase because costs are going up? If so, would special pricing lock you into less-than acceptable margins, or can you sustain it over the life of the relationship?

Is the competitor having other problems? Did a top salesperson quit? Has the company changed hands? The call may have nothing to do with you.

customer loyaltyFinally, what would your customers, the loyal ones who do business primarily with you, think of this special pricing? Nothing stays secret forever. Are you risking currently profitable business in the chase for more? What will your salespeople think about giving out a better deal than their most dependable accounts get? Are you risking general price erosion?

It’s in the nature of every entrepreneur to chase the new and challenging. The psychological thrill of winning, taking away someone else’s business, is very tempting.

Your business has been built on your friends (loyal customers), not the friends of your competitors. We all know that retaining a good customer is more profitable than hunting for new business.

Ask the prospect why he or she is calling you. The answer may surprise you. If they won’t answer, dig a little deeper before you pull the trigger on discounts.

(Thanks for this one, Harry.)

Do you enjoy Awake at 2 o’clock? Please share it with other business owners.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Marketing and Sales | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Help Your Friends, Not Your Competitors’

  1. CS says:

    Brilliant. Great summary of the possible reasons and excellently explained reasons why you don’t jump at every chance to bid or propose.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Is Two Weeks Fair Notice?

I formerly employed an assistant who held a Masters Degree in Human Resources. On occasion she’d say “I love working here. I’ll never quit.”

Of course, as a good employer I felt an urge to reply with equal commitment, but I couldn’t. I’d say “You realize that you can say that every day for the next 1,000 days, and then just never show up to work again. There is no penalty. But if even once I reply ‘And I’ll never fire you,’ I’ve offered a verbal contract and can be sued if I change my mind.”

We’d both laugh, because we knew it was true. The continuing employment relationship is completely stacked in the workers’ favor. Any verbal or written promise of continuing employment creates an obligation on the part of the employer. The company must document any change in those conditions.

Under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining (WARN) act an employer of more than 100 people must give at least 60 days notice of a layoff. I’ve known several companies of that size who experienced a sudden downturn in business. Faced with a choice between compliance and having the company go under, they took their chances with ignoring the law.

quitYet your most critical employee, your second in command, top salesperson, or an engineer in the middle of a large and complicated project, can just call one day and say they’ve gone to work for a competitor. The law says they have that right unless contractually prohibited.

The verbal or written promise is one reason why many small companies avoid employment agreements. That’s like entering into any other long-term business agreement on a handshake. It may feel like an expression of trust, but a contract makes sure that both parties understand what is expected.

The employee should commit to following company policies, appropriate use of social media (you can’t dictate that in your handbook, but they can agree to it in exchange for employment), to hold proprietary company information confidential, give appropriate notice of voluntary termination, and non-solicitation of other employees after they leave.

Appropriate notice can be spelled out as different lengths of time for different levels of responsibility.

In return the employer promises to follow written policies for discipline and performance review, and give appropriate notice of termination except for cause, with pay in lieu of notice if such arises.

Let’s face it, most employers who avoid employment agreements do so because they don’t want to hold up their end. Their handbook is either nonexistent or a dusty tome that people sign off without reading. They conduct employee evaluations rarely or not at all. They don’t want to be obligated to pay anything at termination merely because they’ve failed to sufficiently document the reasons.

Our economy is based on over 70% services. In a service business, employees are almost invariably the number one expense. You can either look around at your staff every day and know that they may all be gone tomorrow, or you can treat their employment for what it is, a critical component of your business.

By the way, the assistant eventually left (everyone does), but she did so with appropriate notice, and we are still friends.

If you enjoy Awake at 2 o’clock, please share it with another business owner.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

7 Responses to Is Two Weeks Fair Notice?

  1. David Basri says:

    The article has a lot of prudent advice. However, if you added up the total number of times employees have lost jobs without fair notice or reason, and the number of times employers have had employees leave without fair notice or reason, it is not clear that employers would end up with the short end of that stick. The truth is that without mutual respect either party may treat the other poorly. It is because of mutual respect that you and your past employee parted on good terms. When employment is mutually beneficial and mutually satisfying, it will end appropriately even when the termination is inconvenient for one or the other.

  2. Mike Wright says:

    It is always important to outline in advance how a business relationship will end; Rather it is an employee, vendor or partner.

  3. Shouldn’t it be a two-way street?

  4. Greg says:

    The laws today that protect employees in these situations are fair. Companies need to understand that employee loyalty (or lack of) is a product of their own making. When an employee puts their notice in, they’ve been ready to leave for awhile. You protect your investment in employees by making sure the investment continues to work for both parties. When it no longer does, you’re welcome to part ways if it’s for the right reasons.

  5. Maryanne Guido says:

    What if you have a holding company and employees work for separate incorporated companies under the umbrella and each individual company has less than 100 employees each?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Extreme Democracy

Last week the British government announced that it was naming their new scientific research ship the RSS Sir David Attenborough, acting counter to the  people’s selection of “Boaty McBoatface,” despite that name being an overwhelming 3:1 favorite over the next closest choice.

Last summer the Parisian government took down the website for choosing the Eiffel Tower’s next paint job when it became obvious that pink was the runaway winner.

Who decided that letting the people cast binding votes on important issues was a good idea? Would any sane business owner run his or her company that way?

We misuse the term democracy to mean any type of government where the people have regular input into their representation. That’s wrong. A monarchy is rule by one (mono). An oligarchy is rule by a few. A theocracy is rule by religion. A democracy is rule by the majority. In any given US voting group, 49.99% of the voters have little or no say if they lose.

Our pledge of Allegiance says “…and to the republic for which it stands.” The Founding Fathers never anticipated a two-party oligopoly on government. They thought there would be multiple different interests represented in the legislature. Voting rights were initially left to the states, all of which required ownership of property, a stake in the system, to vote. (Contrary to popular belief, a number of states permitted women and people of color to vote, as long as they owned property.)

your vote countsA recent video by two female sportscaster details the unforgivable email assaults they receive on the Internet. They are threatened with rape, beatings and murder on a daily basis.  Yet the perpetrators are allowed to decide qualification for the most powerful position on earth.

How would your company fare if every decision was put to an employee vote?

“We have the opportunity to take on a huge customer. It means we are all going to work much harder. All those in favor?”

“Times are tough. We need to cut back on staff. Please decide who gets laid off.”

“I have an excellent offer to purchase the business. A show of hands, please, to determine whether or not I will accept it.”

Crazy, right? Your employees often can’t understand the bigger picture. They don’t see the implications down the road, even if you try to explain the eventual upside of a decision. They don’t share the responsibility that comes with making hard or critical decisions.

Yet, like the email harassers, we’ve decided that voters don’t have to evidence any responsibility for their actions. They can exercise their franchise, and then expect others to deal with the consequences of their decisions.

“In a democracy, people get the government they deserve.” Joseph de Maistre

‘Real  liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments.” Alexander Hamilton

If this post inspires you to call me names or impugn my character, please don’t bother. I screen comments (there’s no universal right to mouth off here!) If you agree or disagree, and can do so civilly, feel free to contribute your opinion.

Please share Awake at 2 o’clock with other business owners.

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

4 Responses to Extreme Democracy

  1. Great post. Furthering this conversation, I highly recommended Dan Kennedys book: No B.S. Ruthless Management of People & Profits…..a word of warning you will need some thick skin, some honest self evaluation, and Clarity to really appreciate the valuable lessons taught in this book.

  2. David Basri says:

    Here, here! (with respect to our British forebearers).

  3. Martin Frey says:

    Well said. True freedom comes when we are obedient and submit to something greater than ourselves. Human are funny animal in search of transcendental joy yet they typically look for it in “things” and fleeting pleasures.

  4. Chris Christianson says:

    Very well said. Not all are qualified to lead and thus should be grateful to those that are!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What Does HR Do?

What are the roles of a Human Resources professional in your organization? A common rule of thumb is that a company should have a dedicated HR function once it reaches 80 employees or so.

This post comes from a recent meeting of a business owner peer board that I facilitate. Many thanks to the group for this excellent analysis. The ratio of employees to HR specialists ranged from about 60:1 (for companies comprised mostly of professionals) to 120:1 (for those with  a high percentage of production workers.)

Human ResourcesEveryone starts by hiring someone to administer benefits. That is more of a clerical position, and doesn’t necessarily require specialized education or training in human resources. Once we start writing paychecks for a professional HR manager, however, we often struggle to determine which higher level functions they should assume.

I’ve broken down the list of potential responsibilities into three categories, acquisition, retention and strategic support.

Acquisition: This is the first area of responsibility beyond benefits administration. The HR professional should be systematizing and supervising the recruiting process. Are all candidates going through the same interviewing process?  How do you measure return on investment for advertising? Would the company benefit from an internship program, and how are interns selected and ranked? Which openings are worth retaining a headhunter, and which can be handled entirely in-house? How is a request for additional staff justified and approved? Is there a system for integrating new hires?

Retention: Are performance reviews conducted systematically, consistently and on time? Is training or mentoring available and utilized to help people move along on a career path? Are salary and benefits competitive with others in your industry, and with other companies in your area who seek the same type of workers? Is there a process for handling complaints objectively and in the same manner for everyone? The HR manager also assumes responsibility for morale, including regular employee satisfaction surveys and company events.

Strategic: These functions should be expected from an HR Director position. They include designing and purchasing insurance (in many companies, the third largest single expense item,) government compliance/reporting and succession planning for key positions. An HR Director can also project future labor costs for budgeting, and support the executive team with assessments of labor market conditions and potential threats to the company. They are also responsible for the company’s image in the community, and its role as a corporate citizen.

In a small business, every one of the responsibilities listed above are yours. I’m sure some of you are saying “That’s all nice, but I am running a business. I can’t spend all of my time on HR activities.” True; but if you grow they will become increasingly important, especially in tight labor markets like the one we are currently experiencing.

Whether you are hiring your first HR specialist, or have one who is asking “Where do I go from here?”, I think this list is a fairly comprehensive look at how much a good professional can do for your company. After all, you can’t do anything without your employees.

Do you think we missed something? Please add it in comments.

Do you know someone dealing with a similar issue? Share “Awake at 2 o’clock” with another business owner.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

4 Responses to What Does HR Do?

  1. John Vena says:

    I think you have done a good job describing most aspects of the role of an HR professional, but you haven’t touched upon “discipline”. In our organization, 60 plus employees, we use an HR contractor. In addition to those areas mentioned, a large amount of their time is spent supporting supervisors and department heads on how to respond to issues ranging from harassment claims to customer service complaints, attendance and general behavior problems. You haven’t addressed activities such as tracking discipline, conducting investigations, coaching managers and employees with policy or behavior infractions. Would you assign such tasks to the HR role as described by your “peer group”.

    • John F. Dini says:

      Excellent point, John. I don’t think it is appropriate to have HR actually conduct discipline, but making sure it is complaint with both government and policy, administered even-handedly, and that management is supported when claims arise should certainly be in there. Perhaps the group just doesn’t have any discipline problems. (wink)

  2. Hi John,
    It is true, that, HR activities are very important if you grow, Choosing and Hiring qualified leads are crucial.
    Thank you for sharing your knowledge unto us.
    I really appreciate your work. Great job and Keep it up John! 🙂

  3. John says:

    Or, if you don’t want to worry about hiring a skill you have never hired before, and having a single role with nobody for that person to learn from, consider outsourcing those administrative, process and systems to experts you don’t want to “buy” in your small business. Also, outsourcing allows you to get the critical work done, by fully qualified professionals, without carrying non-revenue generating employees. Hence the birth of the PEO! We are growing like crazy because owners know they their time is better spen focused on profit and growth!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Too Busy to Do Business

Another tax filing season has passed, and the entire US accounting profession comes up for air. Of course, thousands of businesses and individuals have filed for extensions, thereby postponing the pain of calculating their final numbers for anywhere from a few days to six months.

As the CPAs emerge from their winter burrows and blink in the sun, the rest of the business community reenergizes, suddenly able to move forward with planning and analysis that has been languishing while their numbers-crunchers were busy losing sleep and feasting on ramen noodles.

I met with one firm about doing some valuation work in late February. They appeared to be excited about getting the business. When I called in mid-March with my first project they responded with “It’s tax season. Can you wait until mid-May?”

Perhaps it isn’t totally illogical to expect that an exiting business owner, having spent 30 years developing his largest single asset, should be willing to wait a few more months to begin his transition. The question isn’t so much whether it is unreasonable; it is why it should be necessary.

I have multiple clients with various needs, but all require some interface with their accountant. Some CPAs respond with quick but unsettling responses. “I think you can do this, but you’ll have to wait until after tax season for a definite answer.” Great. Business people always like making million dollar decisions based on “Maybe or maybe not.”

Others simply beg off. “I can’t even take the time to think about that until after April 15th.” Still others don’t respond at all, obviously expecting that their clients will automatically forgive what would be an unforgivable breach of professional service expectations at any other time.

Even the definition of “any other time” is narrowing. The tax rush used to be the few weeks leading to April 15th. Then the weeks leading to March 15th (the business filing deadline) moved back the start of the out-of-service CPA season. With the increasing complexity of tax laws, and the concomitant rise in extension filings, the time between September 1st and October 15th has also become a no fly zone. The week or two leading up to May 15th and June 15th are slightly better, but not by much.

shutterstock_93857353Tax complexity makes handling almost any transaction without professional advice foolhardy, but are we really supposed to just draw a line through 16 weeks, or 1/3 of the annual business cycle?

There are lots of suggestions about how to simplify the code or spread out the reporting deadlines. A flat tax is interesting, but would largely remove the ability of legislators to show favoritism to big supporters and home-state causes, so I’m skeptical of its chances.

Another proposal is to let individuals file by their birthdays, or let calendar-year businesses pick another year-end. The government’s excuse is that it would delay revenues for the year of implementation. Really? Like they were planning on a balanced budget that year? Heaven forbid they would have to borrow any more than the $1,000,000 a minute they do already.

Until we find some more sensible way to fund the public sector, business owners are subject to double indemnity. Not only do we have to pay the bill, but doing so correctly requires that we also at least partially delay our attempts to earn the income that will be taxed.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Exit Planning | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

4 Responses to Too Busy to Do Business

  1. Dan Bowser says:

    I love the title. When I was more active in my consulting practice and looking for additional clients, my best prospecting time was tax season. Business owners were unwilling to wait for advice and guidance. As a result, they left their CPA do the tax work and looked to me for the lucrative strategic planning and implementation. I love tax season.

  2. Mike Wright says:

    Excellent. Another thing to think about when I hear politicians talk about helping small business, and I know they have no concept of what small business is about.

  3. Ann says:

    Hi John,
    Great posts !
    Very interesting article thank you for posting !

  4. Great post John! I actually had a very similar conversation with a business owner only a couple of days ago on this topic. In Canada, our tax deadline is April 30th, so we have another week of our accountants being unavailable. You also hear so much about them working 80 hours a week, getting no sleep, rushing to meet deadlines, that it also begs the question as to how many mistakes are happening? Not intentionally, but only because of the time crunch and the pressure of the deadline. Realistically, as everyone talks about “added value” in our industry, you know that at tax time, this certainly isn’t happening.

    I agree with you that the governments need to come up with a new system for tax filing deadlines and not make it universally the same for every person. We’ve done it for businesses and base it on their fiscal year end, so why can’t it also be done for individuals?
    Thanks for a great read!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *